Anticompetitive issues in the infant formula industry

 
 
 
 

Anticompetitive issues in the infant formula industry

Show simple item record


dc.contributor.advisor Ruffer, Rochelle en_US
dc.contributor.author Jovanovic, Dusan en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2008-06-30T15:37:32Z
dc.date.available 2008-06-30T15:37:32Z
dc.date.created 1998 en_US
dc.date.issued 2008-06-30T15:37:32Z
dc.identifier.uri http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu997197215 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2374.OX/3113
dc.description The center of interest of this paper is anti-competitiveness of the infant formula industry. Following the analysis of the industry behavior and legal activities concerning it, this essay hypothesizes that the U.S. government will not succeed in obtaining a legal judgement that would regulate the policies of the major infant formula firms. The infant formula industry is a heavily concentrated oligopoly. The main market share holders serve more than eighty percent of the market. Industry behavior is characterized by simultaneous, almost identical price increases by the industry leaders. The subsidiaries that produce and market formula are the most profitable sections of their organizations. The marketing practices of formula producers are highly controversial. Top producers adhere to the concept of ethical advertising or advertising formula through licensed physicians only. This type of advertising severely limits the entrance of new competition into the industry and may violate antitrust laws. Demand for formula by women who do not breast-feed is relatively inelastic, which results in a high level of brand loyalty and price following behavior by the producers. Also at the center of interest is the government’s Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) Program, which provides formula at low or no cost to mothers in lower income brackets. Numerous court cases were brought against infant formula producers, alleging price fixing behavior and restraint of competition in the market. These cases were not successful in winning judgements against the formula producers so far. The paper argues that the specific market climate, as well as the ambiguity of certain concepts in antitrust statutes, will allow the formula producers to continue with their behavior without the government’s interference. en_US
dc.format application/pdf en_US
dc.format iv, 44 leaves en_US
dc.rights unrestricted en_US
dc.rights Copyright and permissions information available at the source archive en_US
dc.subject infant formula en_US
dc.subject trusts en_US
dc.subject price fixing en_US
dc.subject antitrust en_US
dc.title Anticompetitive issues in the infant formula industry en_US
dc.type Electronic Thesis or Dissertation en_US
dc.degree.name MA en_US
dc.degree.level masters en_US
dc.degree.discipline Economics en_US
dc.degree.grantor Youngstown State University en_US
dc.contributor.publisher Youngstown State University / OhioLINK en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record